Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Prehistoric religion?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,164
    Thanks
    265
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    Dead bodies are "gross". So perhaps neanderthals had the same concept as in modern English.


    The bottom line here is that I see no more evidence than no evidence-- it's possible that they had religion, and many other things are possible. It's not concrete enough to establish probabilities/statistics, so we're left with the same evidence as no evidence-- anything is possible.

    And in my mind, burying the dead likely preceded religion; it's a practical act that has many more reasons than religion. Later, it became associated with religion. In fact, there is even some possibility that it caused (or was part of the cause of) religion-- children asking their parents "why do we bury the dead?" and the response was some euphamism about the bodies staying preserved for the future-- not too far off from an idea of "afterlife".
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| espa˝ol | Deutsch | italiano | portuguŕs | catalÓ | un peu de franšais | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,394
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 153 Times in 147 Posts
    Blog Entries
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by djr33 View Post
    The bottom line here is that I see no more evidence than no evidence-- it's possible that they had religion, and many other things are possible. It's not concrete enough to establish probabilities/statistics, so we're left with the same evidence as no evidence-- anything is possible.
    I couldn't agree more. And one might even express doubts about how the Neanderthal remains (mentioned in the web page) must be interpreted. Without further proof, is it not 100% sure they are burials.
    I like this skeptical approach ('we don't know for sure until further notice') much more than the 'default' vision of creationists. It says here, without any hesitation, that Neanderthals were not evolutionary links but normal humans, descendents from Noah, forced to live in harsh conditions after the dispersal of humanity at Babel.
    I should stress in all fairness that many Christians are NOT creationists, see this.

Similar Threads

  1. Select multiple religion & want its caste to be displayed
    By samir in forum Looking for such a script or service
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-04-2012, 06:45 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •