Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 82

Thread: Firefox is too slow...

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N 11░ 19' 0.0012 E 142░ 15' 0
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 89 Times in 88 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    That's the version I already have... What's wrong with it?
    As a new comer to firefox, it's the only look I've ever seen.

    You can also make some changes to firefox like changing the colour of the button and editing the homepage (about:home)

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,162
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    It's hard to say exactly what is different. I liked the simplicity of the previous version without the gradients, roundedness, etc. Now a few of my addons also look really weird (for example, odd outlines showing up, strangely sized icons), etc. It's not awful-- but it's far from an improvement in my opinion, so why change it? And why not let it stay the same?

    Everyone seems to be complaining that FF is trying to emulate Chrome, and I agree-- that's not why I use FF. In fact, if that's why I used FF, I'd just use Chrome. The developers seem to have really missed the point.

    I'll check out modifying it a bit myself. Thanks for the idea. I'd just rather not do it manually (and it might still not allow all options to be modified).
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| espa˝ol | Deutsch | italiano | portuguŕs | catalÓ | un peu de franšais | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    N 11░ 19' 0.0012 E 142░ 15' 0
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 89 Times in 88 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Hmmm... since doing the speed mod, sometimes when visiting websites (noteably facebook and this site) aren't loading properly... some of the page loads and is all positioned wrong and then it just stops loading...

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,162
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    Hm. I haven't had much happen although a couple times things have jumped around a little bit when it loads, but almost too fast to see-- certainly too fast to be bothered by it.

    I have, however, had FF getting stuck a little more than usual and then having to wait for it to catch up (basically almost freezing for a few seconds, maybe a minute). It has done that before, but I think it may be due to the speed change. I'll keep an eye on it.
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| espa˝ol | Deutsch | italiano | portuguŕs | catalÓ | un peu de franšais | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,162
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    I've decided to set an initial delay of "30" instead of "0" to see what happens.
    http://waytobliss.blogspot.com/2012/...out-3-30x.html

    My computer has recently been incredibly sluggish, especially when Firefox has had a number of tabs open. Let's see it that helps. I'm a bit worried that speeding up Firefox means taking a lot of ram/processing power.
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| espa˝ol | Deutsch | italiano | portuguŕs | catalÓ | un peu de franšais | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE PA USA
    Posts
    28,925
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 3,190 Times in 3,154 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12

    Default

    My solution has been, reluctantly to no longer use the Fox as my primary browser. I never really did even when it was set as the primary. That setting governs which browser is used for preview in my editor, in general which browser is used when the OS sees a call to open a web page. For a long time now I've used Opera for most browsing. Anyways, I've set Chrome now as the default because it's less of a problem and its developer tools are better integrated than Opera or Firefox. It's also usually very good and fast should the OS decide it needs to launch a web page. One thing I don't like about it, and this might not be its fault, it makes updating Adobe products less automated. That has pluses and minuses though and might be a new approach on Adobe's part in general, but I think it's just how the Adobe update process reacts when Chrome is the primary.
    - John
    ________________________

    Show Additional Thanks: International Rescue Committee - Donate or: The Ocean Conservancy - Donate or: PayPal - Donate

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,162
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    For the moment, my computer is running faster. Admittedly, I have less open today. So, we'll see.

    But if it keeps being this difficult to continue with FF, I probably will end up using Chrome. I'm disappointed in Mozilla for not producing a better browser, however. It might not be easy to make FF faster, but it should be possible-- after all, Chrome has done it. And FF has always seemed to have some sluggishness issues-- overusing RAM in various versions, etc. And, beyond that, I just don't like the current direction of development for FF. Each new update seems worse than the last, although it's important to upgrade for security (and functionality sometimes).

    My suggestions to Mozilla:
    1. Improve the speed of Firefox. Really. Actually do it-- it must be possible. (Even if that's by version 20, or 30, whatever, just do it.) And not as a workaround, or in a way that uses too much system power-- RAM, CPU, whatever.
    2. Stop making the browser worse. It was fine as of v3-4. So keep that. Don't keep messing with the UI, and don't make it a Chrome look-alike. The whole reason people use FF is to NOT use Chrome. If FF is becoming Chrome, we may as well all switch over anyway. At his point FF is sort of like a broken/outdated version of Chrome.
    (3. Stop coming up with a new "version" every 1-2 months! Who thought this was a good idea?)
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| espa˝ol | Deutsch | italiano | portuguŕs | catalÓ | un peu de franšais | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  8. #68
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Hitchhiking the Galaxy
    Posts
    1,013
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 139 Times in 139 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    This article basically sums up your words.
    "Most good programmers do programming not because they expect to get paid or get adulation by the public, but because it is fun to program." - Linus Torvalds
    Anime Views Forums
    Bernie

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,162
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    Wow, it does. And it makes it clear that I'm not alone in this. I've seen a few other people out there complaining, but that article makes it pretty clear that FF/Mozilla is seriously misguided. I guess they don't want to be a good browser any more.

    Is it entirely open source? Can a group of programmers just take it and fix it, leaving Mozilla behind? Or would that violate something? Mozilla shouldn't be in charge of FF any more (or perhaps their other products, from what that article says).
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| espa˝ol | Deutsch | italiano | portuguŕs | catalÓ | un peu de franšais | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE PA USA
    Posts
    28,925
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 3,190 Times in 3,154 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bernie1227 View Post
    This article basically sums up your words.
    I'm surprised at you Daniel. I would have thought that you'd point out that your remarks sum up the article, not the other way around.

    Don't they? They came after it and a more brief, so isn't that the proper meaning of the term?
    - John
    ________________________

    Show Additional Thanks: International Rescue Committee - Donate or: The Ocean Conservancy - Donate or: PayPal - Donate

Similar Threads

  1. Pc slow
    By mafuz62 in forum Computer hardware and software
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-29-2012, 05:08 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-04-2011, 05:47 AM
  3. Slow Load
    By whatthemeh in forum Dynamic Drive scripts help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-15-2010, 07:52 PM
  4. IFRAME is slow in IE
    By alexan in forum HTML
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 10:24 AM
  5. Slow Download
    By gracie4prez in forum Dynamic Drive scripts help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-27-2005, 11:57 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •