Structure for storing posts

[keyboard1333]

Note: This isn't so much a sql coding question as a structuring question.

My question is this - how do the big guns (example: f a c e b o o k) store the peoples posts.

Would they have one big table and every post that is made, gets stored in their?
Or would they have a database for each person and have a table in it for all the posts they've made.

Sorry if I haven't been clear enough,
Keyboard1333

[djr33]

I don't know, and that's an interesting question. But I'd imagine that they have special software for at least some of it. It probably works like a cloud server but for a database. I don't know if it copies every bit of info or just in chunks, but it probably can search around various chunks at the same time. It seems like mixing both methods would be most efficient, if you went through the trouble of programming all of that yourself-- and they certainly have the resources.

It could always be a very very well maintained flat file system. Part of that might be used for things like posts that can't be searched (right?), just something displayed on screen. For usernames and thinks like that (that you can search) it would be in the main database.

Has anyone else seen inside any of the sites like that?


A similar question would be how google stores its information, but that's just a completely different situation without the social piece (so different databases can be queried in smarter ways, probably). And lots of caching of queries.

[keyboard1333]

I was thinking maybe you could store them all in one huge table then wondered if it would be to slow????

[djr33]

It would be. Databases can get pretty big, but to store all of facebook in one table would be ridiculous.

[keyboard1333]

Could you store all the posts in one table on one day? Then create a new one the next day and so on?

[james438]

Makes sense. Good thought keyboard1333.

[keyboard1333]

Makes sense. Good thought keyboard1333.

Really??? oh, okay . Would there still be to many posts per day? (Of course depending on the popularity of the site).

Does anyone know about how many values a mysql table could hold???

Keyboard1333

[traq]

The size limit is usually imposed by the operating system, not MySQL itself.

For example, if you are using the MyISAM driver, you can have table (table, not DB) sizes "up to 4GB by default (256TB as of MySQL 5.0.6), but this limit can be changed up to the maximum permissible size of 65,536TB"
[http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/...ize-limit.html]

Yeah, you read that right. Sixty-five Thousand Terabytes.

As you imagine, though, it probably wouldn't run very efficiently, and I don't know what computer/OS would support a file that large.

About the FB question: interesting read.

About your question:
I would suspect that "posts" are broken up across several different tables.

The actual text of the post might be in one table, which user it belongs to in another, who likes it in another, and so on. Most of it would be "relational" information: just index keys that point to where to look. Then, there would need to be a lot of indexing, and caching becomes essential long before you get to "FB" size.

[keyboard1333]

and caching becomes essential long before you get to "FB" size.

Sorry if this is a dumb question... but what do you mean by that?

[traq]

instead of querying the DB every single time, query once and save (cache) the result. (Memcache is a common caching tool.)

It saves a lot of overhead (DB connections, queries, etc.), especially for common/frequent queries.

The cache can be cleared regularly, or left for quite some time in the case of static data.