C/c++![]()
C/c++![]()
Adrian ~ facebook | gist/github
['66.215.156.37','208.75.149.97'] // ip,ip array!
"Take that sticker *off* your hat; you look stupid" --Wil Wheaton
So it's a difference of the PHP and C, rather than the MySQL code itself? That makes sense. But I do wonder, just relative to the MySQL part (eg, the actual searching in the query), whether they run at the same speed. The PHP loop, for example, probably is slower than a C loop, but if MySQL via PHP is slower than MySQL via C, that's worth knowing.
Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| Deutsch | italiano | español | português | català | un peu de français | Ninasoma Kiswahili | 日本語の学生でした。| درست العربية
the loop that constructs the query would be faster, yes - the execution of the statement would be the same. MySQL is MySQL. Of course, the actual savings probably wouldn't be noticeable unless you had a _lot_ of traffic. and most web hosts don't give you enough access to write stored procedures unless you have a private server anyway.
Adrian ~ facebook | gist/github
['66.215.156.37','208.75.149.97'] // ip,ip array!
"Take that sticker *off* your hat; you look stupid" --Wil Wheaton
djr33 (01-10-2012)
can be simplified as:Code:SELECT * FROM table WHERE col != 'this' AND col != 'that'
Conversely:Code:SELECT * FROM table WHERE col NOT IN ('this','that')
can be simplified as:Code:SELECT * FROM table WHERE col = 'this' OR col = 'that'
These were the only two shorthand functions I could find. refCode:SELECT * FROM table WHERE col IN ('this','that')
To choose the lesser of two evils is still to choose evil. My personal site
Bookmarks