Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Best Image Optimization for Screen = Awful Print Quality.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Smile Best Image Optimization for Screen = Awful Print Quality.

    I would like to optimize some large photos for the web so that they will look great on screen at about 900px width, but print out awfully, very bitmapped, and/or not fit for re-distribution or re-selling. If someone were to steal the photos, at least I would have peace of mind that they couldn't re-print them with high quality.

    Thoughts?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois, USA
    Posts
    12,164
    Thanks
    265
    Thanked 690 Times in 678 Posts

    Default

    There's no magic trick here.

    Print resolution is suggested to be 300dpi (dots per inch) or higher. For screen/web resolution, the standard (and max, in most cases) is 72ppi (pixels per inch, equiv. to dpi).

    So, generally it will look better on the screen than in print.

    You can adjust that as desired, I suppose, but it'll look increasingly worse on screen as you make it look worse for the printer. Fairly simple.

    You could play with color space some. Screens use RGB, whereas printers use in most/many cases CMYK, but the conversion is usually smooth unless you have some particular insight to give that algorithm problems.

    Anyway, there's no solution here. If you put it on the web, people can steal it. Deal with it. (Search all you'd like, but that is the final answer, and the best you'll do is save some time not searching for something else.)

    Wish there was something better to suggest.

    Remember, you can always use watermarks, if that fits your purpose.
    Daniel - Freelance Web Design | <?php?> | <html>| español | Deutsch | italiano | português | català | un peu de français | some knowledge of several other languages: I can sometimes help translate here on DD | Linguistics Forum

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Currently: New York/Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,735
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 519 Times in 507 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JackJack View Post
    I would like to optimize some large photos for the web so that they will look great on screen at about 900px width, but print out awfully, very bitmapped, and/or not fit for re-distribution or re-selling. If someone were to steal the photos, at least I would have peace of mind that they couldn't re-print them with high quality.

    Thoughts?

    If you're that worried about people printing it and re-selling, just remove the images before printing.

    Of course, there are ways people will get around it. Like Daniel said...it's just part of putting content on the Internet.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    254
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    Just save the photo as a low quality JPEG. This will look fine on the screen, but nobody will pay for it.

    Or just re-save the picture again and again as a jpeg to lose quality.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Print Screening

    There's a million ways you can use to try (I emphasize try) to prevent stealing of images. BUT
    Print screening is always going to get past every thing you try.
    All you do is find the image.
    Press "Print Screen"
    Crop to the image.

    Possible answers to the un-printscreening person trying to steal an image could be:
    <style>
    img-moz-highlight-region
    {
    display: none;
    width: 0px;
    height: 0px
    }
    img:active, img:hover, img:focus
    {
    width: 0px;
    height: 0px;
    display: none;
    }
    </style>

    Or you could use media="print"
    Or you could write a HUGE JS script to add a watermark or pixelate it.
    BUT you can always "print screen".
    Troberto

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    177
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts

    Default

    Or just use photoshop to create a watermark. At least then regardless of the case it is there, and you don't have to bother with the JS. Just make sure you don't watermark the original :P. Yeah, seriously, though...that would suck.
    Verzeihung!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    🌎
    Posts
    528
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    If you're worried about people stealing the image, but do have copies for print/redistribution, here are my thoughts:
    1.
    Quote Originally Posted by troberto
    Code:
    <style>
    img-moz-highlight-region
    {
    display: none;
    width: 0px;
    height: 0px
    }
    img:active, img:hover, img:focus
    {
    width: 0px;
    height: 0px;
    display: none;
    }
    </style>
    I believe this only works with Mozilla-based browsers.
    2. If you are familiar with HTML </div> layers, you can watermark using one. If you are using Photoshop, you can go through the following steps to create a watermark image:
    2a. Open a new document, about 250x20 - 8-bit RGB with a transparent background.
    2b. Go to the Text tool, choose the Arial font face (12pt.), and set the color to black.
    2c. Set the layer opacity to 50%.
    2d. Enter the website URL, ex wikipedia.org [or any other message of your choice]
    2e. Save the file as a transparent PNG. (Options: None)
    You can then use a layer to place the watermark image over the image in the page. You should then install a no-right-click script on the page, to prevent people from simply saving the image, and, if desired, ude the styling quoted above.
    3. And, the #1 tip, keep seperate copies for web and for print.
    ....(o_ Penguins
    .---/(o_- techno_racing
    +(---//\-' in
    .+(_)--(_)' The McMurdo 500

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •