70,000, Twey?

Just a bit ahead of yourself. Ha.
Not mine, the forum's
I don't know if that's an accurate figure (pruning may have happened) but it's a nice round figure anyway, so I thought I'd celebrate it. 
I'm still totally lost. I get the "let's fix it all and create a standard thing"... but I don't see any examples of what the point is, etc.
Parsers can be created with a minimum of effort. An average shopping list may look like this:
Code:
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: bold;">Vegetables
<ul>
<li>Carrots</li>
<li class="done-element">Peas</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
This is a nightmare to parse without a fully-fledged browser, and unless you know the exact design of the page, it may never even work out that that's a shopping list. The point of these "microformats" is that a standard for shopping lists could be defined that requires a shopping list to look like so:
Code:
<ol class="shopping-list">
<li class="category">Vegetables
<ul class="items">
<li>Carrots</li>
<li class="done">Peas</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
A shopping list parser can then extract the required information from the page very easily; even if it has no idea how the page is laid out, it knows just to pay attention to <ol> elements with a class of "shopping-list", it knows that any item with a class of "done" should be shown as being ticked or crossed off the list in some manner, that any item with a class of "category" should be shown as a category, and that it will contain a list of items in that category...
Bookmarks