Ah ideally yes, but we all know how many people out there don't even know what a doctype is, the same for their web pages.Originally Posted by Twey
Ah ideally yes, but we all know how many people out there don't even know what a doctype is, the same for their web pages.Originally Posted by Twey
Then perhaps you should make a note of it in the script instructions?
Twey | I understand English | 日本語が分かります | mi jimpe fi le jbobau | mi esperanton komprenas | je comprends français | entiendo español | tôi ít hiểu tiếng Việt | ich verstehe ein bisschen Deutsch | beware XHTML | common coding mistakes | tutorials | various stuff | argh PHP!
I've modified plenty of your work to good result (I hope). So, feel free to work with it. However, the DOCTYPE question is really moot. The first scroller is highly styled. The styles given are examples only. The default script will work without any styles or DOCTYPE, and if you want to use the first scroller's styles without a DOCTYPE, you only need to adjust the styles to suit.Originally Posted by ddadmin
In light of that (I was unaware of the situation), it would probably be a good idea to present the first example last, if at all, on the official DD demo page.
The problem with using divisions as I did in the 'beta' version is that, unless something better than what I had can be worked out, it will cause even more variation in the appearance of styled scrollers with side mounted controls - by DOCTYPE as well as by browser used.
If simplicity for the user is the goal, I'd be more inclined to make both the side and the bottom mounted control versions have their outer containing element be a table.
- John________________________
Show Additional Thanks: International Rescue Committee - Donate or: The Ocean Conservancy - Donate or: PayPal - Donate
Bookmarks