I had forgotten about that idea and was trying to get an exact pixel position from the elements in the scroller, but I was getting the wrong values. Perhaps this is due to the positioning involved, or I may have inadvertently been querying the wrong elements. I had an idea for one more try on this (exact pixel position). If it pans out it would be much better than a percentage, and I'll let you know. If not, I'm pretty sure quarters would work, as we can easily get the overall 'content height' or whatever, I was already doing that to get to the bottom, and then we could just multiply by .25, .5, or .75.
