Burgin
06-17-2010, 02:34 PM
I've notice that some coders when pacing an image on a page use...
<img src="assets/images/image.png">
and others use...
<img src="assets/images/image.png" width="200px" height="100px">
Both apper to display the image the same but what's the benefits of the dimensions?
<img src="assets/images/image.png">
and others use...
<img src="assets/images/image.png" width="200px" height="100px">
Both apper to display the image the same but what's the benefits of the dimensions?