Log in

View Full Version : dual CSS


James Hillier
07-07-2008, 03:16 AM
I have a web page that needs 2 CSS scripts. How do I place them? I've tried seperate starting right after the "tags" and then tried to combine them. One is for page itself as part or an dreamweaver set for an entertainment site and the 2nd one is for mouse over small photo to large photo. The first one works the second one gives me the [ ] of a photo for both small and large. but the words under the photo in the html shows up ?
JasonDFR
07-07-2008, 08:14 AM
Would you post a link to the page in question?

Thanks.
James Hillier
07-07-2008, 04:17 PM
took out the second one for the photos BUT I can link the page with the other one in it so you can tell me how or where to put the second one.
http://www.jdscaife.com/shopa.html
I wanted to put a larger photo for each of the icons and add even more to the photo book.
Most people do not approve of my writing or photos but to each his or her own as we are STILL a free people (I hope).:confused:
pngsigut
07-07-2008, 06:57 PM
your link is broken sends to a 404 page.
James Hillier
07-08-2008, 03:31 AM
Sorry, my error the page is http://www.jdscaife.com/shopa.htm
pngsigut
07-08-2008, 09:40 PM
what do you needd that links to a **** site.
James Hillier
07-08-2008, 10:48 PM
Number 1 the site is not porm as it deals with erotic ebooks and not just two people with a web cam "getting it on" to try and make a dime.
Second there are no "links" I'm just trying to connect a small icon to show a larger copy of the same photo and while I been waiting for someone's help I appllied a degree of logic and came up with the correct answer myself.

If I do need help in the future I will again post a question as I did this time but I will add in that if you don't like erotica and consider it "****" please don't look at the site to "help me solve the problem".:(:eek::mad:
traq
07-09-2008, 01:01 AM
whether or not you consider it ****ography, you need to say something when you post the link, as many people will consider it ****. It is certainly "adult content" and probably qualifies under the "no objectionable content" rule in the DD rules (http://www.dynamicdrive.com/forums/rules.htm). I'd ask a moderator to be sure.